Looking back on our past peer reviews, I think each process has its pros and cons . The survey made it anonymous which was a pro,but the con was it didn’t really help when it came to revising the essays (well in my opinion). The original process has the pro of editors providing tips as you read through your paper again. The con I guess would be having so many editors at one time. For the survey, it became confusing because editors would do the survey and leave comments when I thought you were only supposed to do the survey.

In the end, I find that the original process is better for me. I know once I graduate I will have to deal with literary criticism, tough editing, rejection, etc. I believe this process helps make me a better writer. The survey served its purpose but with little to go on, I would end up searching the draft trying to figure out what my editor was pointing out.